If you had taken a look at the auto sector a few years back, the majority might have briefly believed that the near future was leaning heavily towards electric vehicles with a rapid and forceful move away from fossil fuels. Car manufacturers began trading traditional methods for batteries and inverter technology. Then everything collapsed, showcasing various approaches taken by the industry.
Ford produced a typical looking F-150 that just so happened to be electric, reviving the Lightning badge before discontinuing it. GM bet everything on a unique platform designed for enormous trucks with massive batteries providing remarkable range. And what about Ram? It never even launched its electric truck with absurd specifications before axing it. However, it was the new companies, namely Rivian and Tesla, that created a roadmap for what was next while their rivals took notes. Now we stand at the brink of the next wave, but do electric trucks truly have any viability?
History will reflect that the initial wave of electric trucks initiated a competition about capabilities, but the outcome wasn’t as predictable or favorable as expected. Many of these financially struggling vehicles could be categorized as disasters or premature attempts. While Ram scrapped its electric truck before it could even launch, Ford abandoned the F-150 Lightning, and GM, for the moment, finds itself in a bind. Sales figures currently hover around just 3% of what the automotive titan initially forecasted. The next generation of electric trucks is now forming with more compact designs, smaller battery capacities, reduced power, and diminished capabilities, all coming with significantly lower price points.
In the latest installment of The Drivecast, we delve into the brief yet tumultuous history of the electric trucks we witnessed arise, fade, and stumble, examining how we arrived at this juncture, the state of today’s market, what the forthcoming electric trucks will resemble, and if an electric truck is feasible.
New to this? The Drivecast is The Drive’s weekly podcast providing an inside look into the most significant controversies, narratives, and figures shaping the automotive world alongside insights into the current state of our roads. With The Drive’s exclusive access and original reporting, The Drivecast seeks to transform every listener into an insider.
Tune in to The Drivecast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or Amazon Music. Enjoy it? Appreciate it? Interested in helping? Leave a five-star rating on your preferred platform to help elevate The Drivecast to a broader audience. Have suggestions, insights, requests, or feedback? Reach out to us at [email protected]. We promise to read every email.
Complete Transcript
Joel: Today’s discussion revolves around electric trucks. For a fleeting moment, it appeared the imminent future would be electric with a swift shift away from fossil fuels. Automakers switched out gears and gasoline for batteries and inverters, yet the pace varied widely and every player approached it in their own way.
Andrew: It’s been intriguing to observe the diverse strategies for adoption unfold. Ford developed a standard-looking F-150 that happened to be electric. GM committed to large battery mega-trucks. Rivian crafted a lifestyle brand centered on a tech-savvy product while Tesla provided us with its infamous design. Many other manufacturers opted to remain in a wait-and-see approach.
Joel: From colossal vehicles equipped with massive battery packs and staggering range numbers to industry-leading advancements and innovative approaches, just like gas trucks, the rise of the initial electric truck generation sparked a competition about capabilities and methodologies. However, history will reveal that the inaugural attempts at electric trucks didn’t transpire as anticipated. They can be characterized as money-losing ventures, often regarded as failures and false starts. Now, new generations of EVs are forming, and of course, in keeping with American preferences, trucks are leading the way, with an array of body styles to follow. But these forthcoming electric trucks fundamentally differ from their predecessors, potentially steering the industry toward a transformation. Aspects such as pricing, functionality, size, and manufacturing approaches will all shift dramatically as manufacturers strive to ward off Chinese competition, satisfy America’s thirst for trucks and SUVs, and enter the electric era. Additionally, there’s the peculiar resurgence of V8 engines and the scarcity of hybrids, the so-called extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs), and even a return to traditional gas-powered ideas. Hence, today’s focus is on electric trucks, the past occurrences, the forthcoming scenarios, and whether any of this genuinely makes sense.
Joel: Let’s quickly set the stage for our audience by sharing our backgrounds, such as where we live and how we use trucks and SUVs, as this context will help clarify our perspectives on the topic.
Andrew: Certainly. I live in a semi-rural area, approximately two hours from New York City, surrounded by forests. I employ trucks for ordinary dump runs and trips to Home Depot, but I also partake in considerable off-roading. I even serve part-time as a guide at a local off-roading school, giving me ample time to consider the intricacies of off-road driving, particularly with electric trucks; it’s a distinct experience. We can revisit that later on.
Caleb: I reside in the Missouri Ozarks, around 18 and a half hours away from New York City, so a bit further than Andrew. Here, trucks are everything; that’s the primary mode of transport for everyone and the first vehicle for most learners. This is integral to my experience. My first vehicle was a 7.3 Power Stroke Ford F-250, an old model I regret parting with. This context illustrates my background, but I do have experience with electric trucks too; however, I believe my foundation in traditional body-on-frame, antiquated types certainly informs my opinions on what these vehicles excel at and where they fall short.
Joel: I live significantly north of Andrew and New York City, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. We own a family cottage up north, where we tow boats and navigate frigid winters. Everyone utilizes winter tires, particularly Nokian Hakkapeliittas. With two kids and a wife, we frequently haul soccer gear and various items. Towing boats and driving in snow, cold conditions—my first vehicle was a Jeep Cherokee XJ, a quintessential SUV. We’ve owned multiple Jeeps and Audis with Quattro systems. Currently, nothing my family or I own can tow less than 7,000 pounds. We have boats weighing around 5,000 pounds, requiring a 20% buffer for safety. I perform a lot of towing, usually over short distances, which is crucial to provide context—typically, the distance for towing boats is around 180 miles in one go. That’s the backdrop for my towing experience, weight considerations, and similar matters. Andrew, I have considerable off-road driving experience in both gas and electric vehicles. Before we dive into the topic, I want to share our personal views on EVs in the market. Let’s revisit your thoughts, Andrew.
Andrew: Absolutely. I have an affinity for EVs, no question. While I lean towards old-school preferences, even bordering on a dislike for technology, I currently own four carbureted vehicles and maybe five. Yet, I genuinely appreciate the advantages of electric vehicles, including emissions reductions and operational simplicity. Off-road, EVs offer practical benefits too. So, I broadly support EV adoption, although I enjoy my old gas vehicles as well.
Caleb: Reflecting on my experience, one of my standout moments with an EV was while testing a Polaris Ranger Kinetic. We own a campground, and I had to retrieve a canoe trailer that had a wheel problem. We improvised a makeshift wheel bearing using zip ties and a T-shirt, then towed the trailer back with that electric vehicle. It worked perfectly, allowing steady movement at two miles an hour—ideal for the scenario. It remains one of my favorite side-by-sides. This context is relevant because we put it to good use, hauling debris during flood cleanup. The ability of EVs to perform work is evident, albeit range anxiety is a primary concern. While one can manage for a week without charging in isolated areas, towing any substantial distance like 100 miles presents challenges. I’m impressed with what EVs can do, especially the Ford F-150 Lightning, as we will discuss further, though it’s clear that the current infrastructure isn’t perfectly aligned for widespread usage in rural areas like mine.
Joel: Returning to my situation, I live far from Andrew and New York City. As I mentioned earlier, I am in Minneapolis. We take trips to our northern cottage, towing boats, while frequently facing extreme winter conditions. I drive with my family, ensuring we haul everything necessary, like soccer gear. Most importantly, my first vehicle was a Jeep Cherokee XJ, the epitome of an iconic SUV, and I recall we’ve had plenty of Jeeps and Quattro Audis. Currently, everything we possess can tow at least 7,000 pounds, given our boats weigh around 5,000 pounds, requiring an additional buffer of safety. I undertake most of my towing short distances—hence the context is crucial. Usually, my towing distance might extend to 180 miles in one attempt. Before we dive deep into the discussion, I wanted to provide a personal insight into our views on EVs across the market spectrum. Andrew, I’d like to revisit your perspective.
Andrew: Yes, for sure. I think EVs are fantastic. I think the idea of incorporating EVs makes sense in many contexts, especially outdoors.
Caleb: You know, my most memorable experience in testing an EV was using a Polaris Ranger Kinetic, which is an electric side-by-side. Our family manages a campground, and I had a canoe trailer issue down a country road. Ingeniously, we constructed a temporary wheel bearing with zip ties and a T-shirt for the trailer. Using the electric side-by-side, we managed to tow it back—it was delightfully efficient at maintaining a steady two miles per hour, ideal for that task. I truly enjoyed testing it. The fundamental reason I believe this is applicable to our discussion is the fact that it performed well under stress. I used it for extensive cleanup efforts after catastrophic floods, hauling loads of branches and debris. Therefore, while EVs can indeed carry heavy weights, range can be a major issue. If I’m operating solely within a single property, range is manageable, but anything beyond 100 miles presents potential complications. Overall, I’m relatively impressed with EVs’ capabilities, like the Ford F-150 Lightning; we’ll get into detail on that shortly. However, it also feels clear to me that many aspects aren’t ideally configured for compatibility in my more rural setting. It’s difficult to generalize for other urban or suburban residents. So, different situations suit different preferences, I believe.
Joel: It is amusing because, reading comments on The Drive, one might think that readers think I despise vehicles with gas engines, but I drive a V8-powered Grand Cherokee, which is a lifestyle choice in itself. Most Grand Cherokees aren’t equipped with V8 engines. There’s no doubt gasoline is prevalent in my life. At the same time, I own an Escalade V with a supercharged 6.2 V8, and while idling at a bus stop, I occasionally feel quite foolish—thinking, here I am potentially harming the planet while consuming premium fuel at virtually zero miles per gallon. It’s outrageous. I’ve driven a range of EVs that excel on-road and off-road; I’ve used the Lightning for towing, and they indeed offer impressive performance. However, as Caleb mentioned, depending on location, range during winter can be an issue, and charging can be problematic for some individuals. It’s not a universal solution, especially in the present landscape. It’s more case-specific. I appreciate both sorts of vehicles—EVs boast merits just as gas-powered cars do, each finding its niche in the broader automotive world. With that context set, let’s delve into our main discussion. Which one of you wants to provide a brief overview of the early stages of electric trucks we’ve seen and their current status?
Andrew: I can give you an overview quite quickly. Certainly, we will want Caleb’s insights on the F-150 Lightning launch experience, but I feel that event marked the point where people began to recognize that electric trucks were indeed a possibility. Rivian’s R1T was available but remained somewhat of a novelty, generating curiosity. When Ford announced the F-150 Lightning, it was the moment everyone acknowledged electric trucks were here to stay. This development likely pushed GM to unveil the Sierra and Silverado, and ultimately Ram will follow suit. So, within this timeframe, we also witnessed Ram’s ambitious plans for a high-range REV, which I spotted at the New York Auto Show a few years prior. Regrettably, that initiative got derailed, shifting to a range extender format instead, correct Joel?
Joel: Yes, it’s a convoluted situation. They initially brought the V8 back as a mild hybrid, but now they’re discontinuing the mild hybrid because enthusiasts prefer a straightforward V8 setup.
Caleb: Honestly, I can’t even keep track of the names anymore. I’ve lost track of what the range-extender version is called.
Joel: Yes, it’s a mess. Now, it’s labeled the REV, isn’t it? Previously, the range-extender was the “Ramcharger,” and the REV was intended as the electric variant. Now the Ramcharger will be utilized for the Wagoneer’s three-row SUV rebranding, while the REV is transformed into a range extender vehicle. None of us, to my knowledge, have yet driven the electric REV. The electric Ram was effectively DOA. We anticipated a 500-mile variant equipped with a 250-some kilowatt battery pack. It was anticipated to weigh around 10,000 pounds, a staggering figure. It never materialized. Although we’ve seen the launches of vehicles like the Rivian R1T, Cybertruck, and others, the introduction of the Ford F-150 Lightning—a fully electric F-150 styling like a traditional F-150 and performing similarly—was noteworthy. It marked a significant moment as the F-150 is America’s best seller, undisputedly. Therefore, when Ford declared their intention to release an electric F-150, truly branding it as such, it felt like a declaration that this future was indeed unfolding before us.
Caleb: Absolutely. I was part of that press event, conducted in Texas, specifically San Antonio, which is true truck territory. There was a fleet of trucks resembling the F-150, just a bit different. Numerous performance tests were arranged, including off-roading and towing capabilities. I distinctly recall an uphill on-ramp while towing about 7,000 pounds; it was exhilarating, with no turbo lag—the electric motors got me on the highway seamlessly. From that moment, I was sold on this potential, though the market had alternative plans.
Joel: All of these trucks were costly, without exception. The Lightning was initially anticipated to start at $40,000, but I don’t think one ever actually arrived at that price.
Caleb: Right, it was only the Pro model offered for fleet sales that was supposed to hit that price point, but then they decided to scrap that plan.
Joel: Precisely. The average Lightning on the market is substantially higher than that; for a regular Lightning, you would be looking at around $75,000 at the least, and the purchased models average closer to $95,000. Similarly, Rivians had an initial launch price starting at $70,000, equipped with four Bosch motors, each costing approximately $5,000—meaning there was roughly $20,000 just in motors for those initial trucks. They faced significant financial losses on those first models. Following price adjustments and subsequent backlash, they had to accommodate early adopters. As for the Rivian you want, you’re looking at something in the range of $90,000 to $130,000. Then there’s GM’s trio: the Hummer, Sierra, and Silverado. These trucks feature battery packs of 205 kilowatt-hours and can reach a range of nearly 470 miles, but they tip the scales at 8,000 to 9,000 pounds. The substantial range isn’t due to their efficiency but rather because of their enormous battery sizes. They are, unfortunately, inefficient despite their impressive statistics. Ironically, that’s contrary to the aims we want to pursue. Still, they offer considerable capabilities. The two innovations I’d note—considered successes—would be the Rivian and Cybertruck. And before you roll your eyes regarding the Cybertruck, I’m personally not a fan. Nevertheless, both vehicles have pioneered progress in the sector. These models emerged as dedicated clean-sheet designs with uncompromising configurations. The Rivian, especially the R1T, has shown remarkable off-roading capability and exceptional on-road performance. In fact, it stands out as the most innovatively packaged modern vehicle available, regardless of price. This exemplifies what determination and creativity can achieve in a clean-slate EV design. Conversely, looking at the Cybertruck, it’s equipped with a 48-volt system and utilizes Ethernet along with CAN bus systems—a feat most mainstream vehicles don’t possess. Additionally, it has revolutionized vehicle design and manufacturing, being among the first trucks to utilize megacastings. This innovation consolidates multiple components into fewer parts, enabling easier assembly and replacements post-collision. These attributes will likely resonate throughout future vehicles we discuss, as they have laid foundational advancements. Innovation tends to involve higher initial costs; it’s the norm. Just consider touchscreens, LED technology, or infotainment systems; these features were first adopted by luxury vehicles. Hence, elements of both the Rivian and Cybertruck are not failures but steps towards a promising direction for the industry. Now, where does this lead us moving forward?
Caleb: Well, it’s simple to criticize startups that haven’t yielded substantial results, right? They offer outlandish ideas that often lack the requisite engineering, funding, or practical design to come to fruition. However, the conversation brings us back to major players making full commitments: Ford, GM, Tesla, and Rivian—no longer considered a startup—are legitimate contenders in this space. Expect to see them continue developing electric trucks, advancing towards a new generation—standardization so that electric trucks evolve into what they should have been from the start. To achieve this, the initial models had to be relatively high-priced experiments, despite Rivian experiencing significant losses. All of this is where Ford’s anticipated $30,000 electric truck comes in—a model reportedly smaller than a Maverick, specifically designed for urban settings, easily maneuverable. This model is meant to represent a paradigm shift in vehicle manufacturing, which Ford heavily emphasizes. Recall our friends at The Autopian—David Tracy even chased that prototype down the road in full camouflage. The QR code leading to their launch page demonstrated that this is a significant venture. Ford understands there’s an audience ready to engage, even starting from those less enthusiastic towards EVs. The response to Slate offers Ford substantial encouragement. Individuals hesitating to commit to newer startup automakers will likely lean towards a Ford, considering the brand’s long-standing truck history. So these emerging models are essential, but they are not the only ones in development.
Joel: That $30,000 electric Ford truck, in fact, will be the first of several on that particular platform—don’t quote me, but around five models are in the pipeline. They start with the truck, which is expected to have the interior dimensions comparable to a RAV4. Its bed may be quite small, beginning at that $30,000 price point. However, it’s uncertain if the ideal model will actually remain within this budget. There is also a lot of uncertainty surrounding the mileage and range, which will depend on the various battery capacities. I believe it will employ LFP technology, which will impact cold weather performance. Nevertheless, it’s important to note that this truck won’t replace the Lightning model—it’s a different vehicle with a simple, straightforward design focused on cost. They’re attempting to revolutionize the assembly process. Caleb is chuckling at my words. This philosophy appears somewhat influenced by the concept behind the Cybertruck’s production design. Essentially, this new truck will rely on fewer megacastings, simplifying construction while requiring fewer components to fabricate, making maintenance and repair tasks more manageable. Such design inspirations likely stem from the Cybertruck, so credit should be given where it’s due, regardless of one’s opinions of its aesthetic.
Andrew: Do you suspect there’s a possibility of the Ford truck including a midgate like the Sierra Silverado EV did originally, or similar to what the Chevy Avalanche offered back in the day?
Joel: No, that’s too costly for a vehicle in this price tier; no chance.
Andrew: Darn it! That feature would be brilliant, though. I was so impressed with its functionality in the Sierra EV. Whenever you have a compact truck like this, it’s essential to maximize utility without sacrificing aesthetics.
Joel: I’m glad you brought that up, Andrew. It connects nicely to a startup named Telo, T-E-L-O, which embodies the point you’re making. Telo has designed a compact truck, with a standard bed around 60 inches long, featuring a midgate option that allows for extending the bed’s length by folding the seats down. It’s designed in a cab-forward style, creating an efficient vehicle arrangement. Furthermore, Telo aims to include fast charging capabilities comparable to high-end EVs, while still offering competitive range estimates. We’ve glimpsed prototypes circulating in LA, indicating that they are on the verge of production. This vehicle corresponds closely with both the Slate and Ford developments.
Andrew: When assessing utility, especially relevant to electric trucks, they don’t necessarily need to handle everything at once as long as they possess multifunctional capacities. I don’t need to carry multiple passengers and a substantial payload simultaneously, but I would appreciate a design that allows flexible work arrangements—allowing individual or group transportation as needed; that ensures a successful formula for smaller trucks.
Joel: Before shifting to Caleb, I looked up specifications for Telo: 0-60 mph in four seconds, 350 miles of range, all-wheel drive, starting at $40,000.
Andrew: Wow, that’s quite impressive.
Caleb: Just what everyone yearns for in a pickup truck, right?
Andrew: Precisely.
Caleb: Regarding Andrew’s earlier remark, it’s worth noting that truck customers typically press forward with accomplishing their tasks, regardless of practicality. Many individuals aspire for heavy-duty capabilities even if the definition of payload shifts with varying expectations. Some truck owners are deeply knowledgeable regarding their ratings and specifications, while others inaccurately gauge their abilities based on assumptions and online information. Those individuals often end up purchasing massive vehicles like a Ram dually with a Cummins engine and a substantial camper. Yet, I don’t intend this observation as a criticism; I am indeed part of that demographic.
Joel: My concern is that many truck owners are merely juggling family responsibilities—taking kids to hockey practices and soccer games. Most of these owners rarely utilize their towing capacities; it’s possible that their hitch has never experienced an actual connection. I believe consumers are often swayed toward wanting a truck more so than objectively discerning their actual needs.
Andrew: The unfolding narrative surrounding Slate intrigues me, especially since they combine an appealing aesthetic with an affordable price point, targeting those yearning for a simplistic truck design. The product speaks to those seeking nostalgia for a straightforward truck. Availability plays a vital role in the purchase decision; if someone desires an elemental truck, Slate offers what they need.
Joel: Given our family situations, by the time we include back seats, the truck bed gets smaller. I’m unsure my kids will be thrilled about the daily gymnastics they’ll have to execute to get in and out of their seats. The practical implications leave me skeptical.
Andrew: You’re right; it highlights why trucks weren’t often utilized for daily commutes 30 years prior. It was mainly due to the inconvenience until we adapted designs to accommodate family requirements.
Joel: I wonder if there’s even a Costco where you live—this isn’t a dig or anything.
Caleb: I operate out of Sam’s Club country; we’re all about Walmart here.
Andrew: Right, right.
Joel: So, here’s the clincher: you hop into an F-150 or Ram 1500; unfortunately, parking lots are overflowing with such vehicles, and for someone like me, navigating one feels cumbersome. I often wonder how people facilitate driving these trucks everywhere—do they need to? Do they prefer to? Does it truly fit in their garages?
Caleb: I own a crew cab long bed F-350, an impressively large truck. Recently, I drove it to the airport, arriving early; there were no surrounding vehicles when I parked. Upon return, I found other cars crowded around me, including a Jaguar right behind. There wasn’t enough space to maneuver, which turned into an exasperating eight-point turn situation.
Joel: “Eight-point turns” could certainly be the title of this podcast! But the situation will change with smaller trucks like the Slate and Telo or Ford’s upcoming EV. Unlike bigger trucks, these will allow simplicity in tight spaces. If someone were hesitant about the Slate’s basic design or skeptical of Telo’s unconventional styling, perhaps looking into Ford would provide reassurance. If the upcoming $30,000 truck has a four-foot bed, with interior space similar to a RAV4, available for around $35,000 to $38,000, that option becomes viable. Keep in mind the average price of a new vehicle just recently rose to around $52,000. Such a truck could efficiently accommodate hockey gear and remain functional without unpleasant odors. Would it offer F-150 legroom? Probably not. Would it fit in your garage? Yes. Would it make the trip to Costco feel more manageable? Absolutely. It’ll be fascinating to monitor how the market reacts to these compact, cost-efficient pickup trucks in an era where the average vehicle price stands at $50,000 and trucks average around $66,000—not even accounting for EVs.
Andrew: It would be wonderful if this small EV movement facilitated a return to more manageable and practical vehicles.
Joel: That would indeed be ironically fitting—how delightful, right?
Andrew: Absolutely, I think it’s a promising direction.
Caleb: Let me offer an intriguing angle: Canoo. Does that name ring a bell for anyone?
Joel: Oh my goodness, I was genuinely excited about Canoo. It was seeming to be so innovative.
Caleb: It had amazing potential to serve multiple vehicle functions, combining aspects of trucks and vans. I was highly optimistic about their prospects. I recall witnessing a Canoo prototype while driving back from the airport; it was about that time when it caught my eye as I traversed the area. I firmly believed those vehicles would be exceptional. Despite never reaching fruition, that vision still resonates.
Andrew: For clarity, that’s spelled “Canoo,” not like the boat. Their design featured a compact pill-like vehicle capable of converting between a pickup and a van. They aimed at fulfilling significant sales, particularly targeting Walmart, based on their offerings. Eventually, they faced severe financial setbacks—didn’t they go under due to lack of cash flow?
Joel: Indeed, they struggled with management changes and shifted their business model. Initially, they had an appealing concept but failed to keep pace, resulting in cash depletion. They cycled through multiple CEOs and adjusted their strategy, which ultimately led to their downfall.
Andrew: What a pity. Their aesthetics and conceptual appeal were remarkable.
Joel: Before wrapping, I want to touch on EREVs, or extended-range electric vehicles, including hybrids. Hybrids are enjoying notable sales success; Ford moves plentiful PowerBoost models, while Toyota’s Tundra offers hybrid options. However, we currently lack any EREV trucks on the market. The concept of EREVs overlaps with hybrids in that it employs a sizable battery pack—think along the lines of 100 kilowatt-hours—and combines it with a traditional engine for supplementing power. However, the internal combustion engine in this case functions as a generator for the battery rather than connecting to the wheels. Currently, Ram plans to debut the REV, transitioning it from an electric truck to an EREV. The Lightning is also purportedly moving towards introducing an EREV configuration with specified range targets. GM plans to introduce hybrid options, though it remains ambiguous whether they’ll be integral hybrids or EREV styles. My intuition suggests they’ll aim for straightforward hybrid setups. Scout has surfaced with its combination of nostalgic design and electric models, yet surprising to me, a significant majority of reservations—around 80%—have been for EREVs, indicating a clear direction for these vehicles.
Andrew: I find conventional hybrids highly efficient as they seem the wisest configuration. Although I wrestle with ideas around EREVs, considering from a maintenance perspective, they may prove to be more complex; an engine running intermittently can experience issues. From my experience maintaining various engines, sporadically utilized engines tend to present difficulties. I harbor concerns about the longevity of these engines under such conditions.
Caleb: My impressions echo similar thoughts; the design elements of that truck exuded charm. When I reviewed the Scout, its aesthetic made a striking impact as its design was on point.
Andrew: The styling is fabulous.
Caleb: That design is compelling! I remember your photos from the unveiling, especially of the charming front bench seat you showcased. However, I suspect they may regret excluding a regular hybrid offering. There may be substantial demand from those nostalgic for the older Scout model, potentially resistant to electrification.
Andrew: Acknowledging the nuances of hybrids may only improve sales outcomes—implementing a mild hybrid model could exponentially increase uptake.
Joel: To conclude, I resonate with Andrew’s initial instincts regarding EREVs. The concept initially feels rewarding—providing endless mobility until battery depletion occurs, allowing the engine to serve as a backup. However, dissecting the efficiency raises questions. Backtracking our prior discussions regarding Ram’s EREV, calculations suggest that once the battery runs out, the vehicle achieves only 18-19 miles per gallon, similar to a traditional V6 Ram, now hindered by the battery weight. Secondarily, the operational complexities are daunting; pickup trucks experience varied usage cycles. Starting, stopping, and the inherent burden of engine maintenance emerge as significant challenges. Most critically, the complications rooted in dual powertrains—balancing an electric powertrain with an internal combustion engine—present logistical conundrums. Instead of carrying two systems, perhaps we ought to focus on enhancing battery capacities and improving charging speeds.
Caleb: Please, employ logic sparingly.
Andrew: Truthfully, I’ve flirted with the idea of supporting EREV; conversely, I find myself conflicted again.
Caleb: Moreover, consider individual experiences—friends and family will invariably engage with new technologies, sampling rides in EREV or electric vehicles. The perception might be impressive initially, but when the gas engine roars to life for charging, that could leave a negative impression. The premise that it merely signals a generator on standby can dull the excitement surrounding cutting-edge technology.
Andrew: Precisely. Some individuals will struggle with the complexities surrounding maintaining two powertrains; I feel a traditional mild hybrid approach can streamline experiences significantly.
Joel: Let’s finalize with collective reflections. To summarize, the intent behind this dialogue centers upon the convergence of factors, such as Slate, Telo’s anticipated production, and Ford’s discourse surrounding its upcoming $30,000 truck. We collectively push for an examination of whether electric trucks logically occupy space in the market. With that notion in mind, it’s essential we each share our perspectives.
Caleb: Simply put, insight suggests that, while acknowledging attributes of electric trucks—remarkable torque and traction—they still suffer from their inability to endure among traditional heavy-duty options. The absence of electric renditions within heavy-duty sectors amplifies this reality. Their unavailability signals that these major brands comprehend the reality as well.
Joel: Right, Andrew, what’s your takeaway?
Andrew: I’ll address things from an off-road perspective. Many enthusiasts tend to highlight the instantaneous torque provided by electric vehicles, noting low-end power advantages for off-roading capabilities. However, a lesser-known benefit arises from electric vehicles’ precise low-speed control. For rock crawling, maintaining steady forward motion through brakes is essential, while electric drive systems enable smoother power modulation. EVs also provide unique benefits like rear-steering capabilities seen in the Hummer EV, which genuinely assist in maneuvering complex settings. So, I genuinely foresee a bright future for off-road electric vehicles.
Joel: Collaborative discussions, such as the insights Caleb shared regarding the commercial aspects versus Andrew’s view of off-road functionalities, reveal that my personal experiences—such as ferrying family to soccer or towing boats over short distances in freezing winter—highlight a critical takeaway: EVs do hold merit but heavily depend on practical application. Caleb’s observation about Super Duty and lack of electric models indicates an overarching consensus regarding attainable usability within the context of heavy performance desires. It becomes prevalent that if a consumer intends to tow an 8,000-pound boat regularly over extensive distances, an electric Lightning truck won’t be suitable; the requisite charging needs for such regularity present challenges. Therefore, it revisits the importance of acknowledging the specific use case. There’s substantial evidence indicating many truck owners utilize these vehicles as regular passenger cars, which could allow electric variants like the Lightning to thrive in this niche, even if they aren’t conceptualized as such. The dialogue surrounding these options will surely surface again in the future.