After years of attempting to mimic a non-legacy automaker, Ford made headlines last fall when it unveiled a new, “software-defined vehicle” platform designed to bring cost-effective EVs to the U.S. market. But if the existing (now phased out) F-150 Lightning and Mach-E aren’t software-defined EVs, then what exactly are they? And what qualifies as a genuine “software-defined” vehicle?
In simple terms, a software-defined vehicle is precisely what it implies. If a vehicle’s features are predominantly digital, rather than needing physical components, it fits the definition. It’s an enticing concept for vehicle manufacturers, whose conventional production costs soar as feature options become more varied. In the ideal software-defined vehicle, nearly every car leaves the factory with identical hardware; software determines which features are activated or deactivated.
This strategy not only lowers production and support expenses (spare parts, etc.), but it also grants the automaker enhanced control over a vehicle’s lifecycle. Over-the-air updates can resolve safety concerns, fix malfunctions, and even add or remove features (whether for a fee or not, unfortunately) in ways that simply aren’t feasible in an analog vehicle—or in ways that are exceedingly frustrating for those who attempted to implement software-defined practices within the limitations of a legacy manufacturing framework.
Indeed, this is where Ford steps in.
The company’s forthcoming EVs will consist of just a few master electronic control units forming a new, internally developed zonal electrical framework. The Lightning, in contrast, has over 70 individual system modules supplied by an almost equally remarkable number of different suppliers. Not only must all those modules communicate with each other for the vehicle to operate, but their producers must also do so every time Ford needs to initiate a significant update to the Lightning’s software package.
Instead of a straightforward, single point-of-contact approach, Ford must depend on what it terms “people putty.”
“So we have ‘people putty’ that connects all these various interfaces,” a Ford engineer shared with InsideEVs. “Because, literally, we require individuals to communicate among people due to these massive, intricate interfaces. [The new UEV]’s team doesn’t need that. Their focus is solely on functional execution.”
Within each of those suppliers lies the potential for mistakes, miscommunication, delays, or any number of other external factors that Ford cannot oversee or manage. Thus, while Ford might argue that its current EVs are software-defined on paper, their complicated architectures essentially negate any advantages that the label could imply.
All of this signifies that even in an alternate reality where Congress didn’t eliminate U.S. EV incentives, the Lightning’s existing (and now-discontinued) architecture was unsustainable. Now, let’s observe what Ford can achieve with a clean slate.
Have a news tip? Reach out to us at [email protected].
**Ford Recognizes Constraints of Current EVs Due to Insufficient Software Definition**
In recent years, the automotive sector has experienced a notable transition towards electric vehicles (EVs), with major companies pouring significant resources into moving from traditional combustion engines to electric powertrains. Ford Motor Company, a long-established figure in the automotive field, has been leading this shift. However, the firm has recently admitted that its existing EV options encounter constraints mainly due to insufficient software definition.
**Grasping the Software Issue**
Software is crucial for the functionality and efficacy of modern vehicles, especially EVs, which depend on advanced systems for battery management, energy efficiency, and user interfaces. The incorporation of software in vehicles not only enhances the driving experience but also guarantees safety, connectivity, and overall vehicle performance. Ford’s recognition underscores a rising concern within the industry: the necessity for comprehensive software solutions that can keep pace with rapid developments in EV technology.
**Present Constraints of Ford’s EVs**
Ford’s existing electric vehicle range, including models like the Mustang Mach-E and the F-150 Lightning, has attracted attention for their performance and aesthetics. However, the company has acknowledged that these vehicles are limited by their software capabilities. Key limitations are:
1. **Battery Management Systems**: Effective battery management is essential for extending range and durability. Ford’s current software may not completely optimize battery performance, resulting in diminished efficiency and possible range anxiety for drivers.
2. **Over-the-Air Updates**: While numerous contemporary vehicles feature the ability for over-the-air (OTA) updates, Ford has encountered difficulties in effectively implementing this capability. This restricts the potential to enhance vehicle performance and resolve software-related issues after purchase.
3. **User Interface and Experience**: The software governing the user interface in Ford’s EVs has faced criticism for being less user-friendly compared to competitors. Limited integration with mobile devices and smart technologies can detract from the overall user experience.
4. **Autonomous Features**: As the industry progresses towards more automation, Ford’s present software limitations obstruct the creation and rollout of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and fully autonomous driving technologies.
**Ford’s Reaction and Future Initiatives**
In reaction to these hurdles, Ford has pledged to invest in software development and partnerships with technology firms to enhance its EV options. The company is concentrating on establishing a more robust software architecture that can facilitate advanced features and optimize overall vehicle performance.
Moreover, Ford is investigating collaborations with tech companies to harness expertise in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics. These alliances aim to develop a more adaptable and responsive software ecosystem that can evolve with consumer demands and technological progressions.
**Conclusion**
Ford’s acknowledgment of the deficiencies in its current EV software highlights a vital aspect of the automotive industry’s shift to electric mobility. As competition heightens and consumer expectations increase, the ability to provide a seamless, high-performing software experience will be crucial for success in the EV arena. By tackling these challenges directly, Ford seeks to position itself as a frontrunner in the electric vehicle sector, ensuring that its offerings not only meet but surpass the requirements of the modern driver.